Yojimbo - 1183 Words

Roger Lin Yojimbo In Yojimbo, Akira Kurosawa satirizes Japanese greed and corruption and portrays the growing influence of capitalism. During this time in Japan, the Yakuza clan was a very strong and dangerous group equivalent to the modern day mafia. The Yakuza clans’ ideals are relatable to two themes prominent in Yojimbo: greed and corruption, and rising capitalist influence. Kurosawa satirizes these two characteristics of the Yakuza clan through the use of mise en scene. One way that Kurosawa used the mise en scene to satire the Yakuza clan was through the use of dà ©cor. The Yakuza clan was a group which took pride in obtaining the valuables and riches of the world. As such, one thing that the Yakuza clan loved beyond measure was†¦show more content†¦Kurosawa used these comical costumes to give Inokichi and the other gamblers a rich and wealthy, yet stupid sort of look, implying that although the gamblers in town are greatly feared, greedy, and rich, inside it all they are all incredibly stupid and contain little common sense. Although not commonly thought of or considered, Kurosawa used a large amount of artificial lighting and dramatic scenery to create effects that he wanted to portray. Without these, Kurosawa would not have been able create the effect that he did during the film. The Yakuza clan was a group that although well-known and feared, did much of their organized crime under the radar and out of sight of authorities. The scene following their crime was often a trail of destruction. Kurosawa decided to satire this with his use of artificial light and dramatic scenic settings. Kurosawa used artificial light to bring the events of the Yakuza clan to light. Since most of the crime done by then is in the dark or undercover, Kurosawa added humor by adding light to everything and thus removing the stealth factor the Yakuza clan always operated by. To further satire them, Kurosawa showed that events that occurred in daylights could often end in incredibly pathetic manners. The best instance of this is in the beginning of the film after Sanjuro decides he will leave Seibei and simply watch the fight between the two gangs. The two gangs nervously edgeShow MoreRelatedComparison Of Kurosawa s Yojimbo And Leone s Fistful Of Dollars1849 Words   |  8 PagesTitle: Two Versions of a Single Story: National Perspective and Auteur Approaches to the Outsider â€Å"Western†. Kurosawa’s Yojimbo and Leone’s Fistful of Dollars Compared. Student: I-Fu Chen Class: CTCS 502 Professor: Priya Jaikumar Due: Oct 8th, 2014 Films: Yojimba, Akira Kurasawa (dir.) 1961, Japan (Viewed Sept 17, 2014) Fistful of Dollars, Serge Leone (dir.) 1964, Italy. (Viewed Oct 1, 2014) This essay is based on films of the same story, told in different ways, withRead MoreComparing Akira Kurosawa s Yojimbo And Sergio Leone s A Fistful Of Dollars2023 Words   |  9 PagesIt is difficult to imagine that two nations as culturally distinct as the United States and Japan in the 1960s, could find any common ground. However, the similarities between Akira Kurosawa s Yojimbo and Sergio Leone s A Fistful of Dollars are undeniable and yet both films reached similar levels of success in their respective nations. In fact, the films were found to be so analogous that Kurosawa is known to have sued Leone for the unlicensed production of his film. All of this aside, it is theRead More Yojimbo : Ideology and Interpretation Essay1180 Words   |  5 PagesYojimbo: Ideology and Interpretation Yojimbo was directed by Akira Kurosawa in 1961. It is the story of a nineteenth century Japanese village that is controlled by two opposing merchants and their clans. The visit of a wandering samurai, who seeks work as a hired killer, interrupts their arguing over a gambling concession. The samurai, Sanjuro, is able to exploit both gangs using his skill with a sword. The story is an Eastern take on the Hollywood western with a dash of satire, with â€Å"TheRead MoreFilm Analysis : Akira Kurosawa s Samurai Films1672 Words   |  7 Pagesof specific angles, transitions, and movements for years to come. Akira Kurosawa’s film Yojimbo is a samurai-based plot with the use of battle imagery by filming motion pictures that capture the true horrors and the glory behind the chaos to captivate his audience. Battle imagery is classified as when directors portray beautiful, rich in color scenes to paint vivid pictures into the audience’s mind. In Yojimbo, Kurosawa â€Å"[invokes] imagery associated with the military codes of the samurai, he createsRead MoreThe Origins of Star Wars801 Words   |  4 Pagessimilar to the robes that the Samurai used, another one is the Japanese katana that the Samurais used in battle and the Light Saber that the Jedi used to keep the peace. George Lucas also borrowed ideas from other samurai movies such as Sanjuro and Yojimbo both by Akira Kurosawa. Apart from having Asian origins, Star Wars also has Western background. One of the earliest science fiction graphic novels known to man is Flash Gordon. It’s clear why George Lucas took some of Flash Gordon’s concepts andRead MoreMaster Filmaker Akira Kurosawa1250 Words   |  5 Pagesmodern action film directors. Kurosawa created films in many genres, each a favorite to many. Rashomon (1950) the film that called attention to artistry of Japanese cinema; High and Low (1963) for brilliance in a film noir style, detective drama; Yojimbo (1961) and Sanjuro (1962) Samurai action pictures that influenced the spaghetti western; Throne of Blood (1957) and Ran (1985) adaptations of Shakespearean drama (Macbeth and King Leer): The Bad Sleep Well (1960,) Red Beard (1965) and Dodeska-denRead MoreChapter 7 Acc55716348 Words   |  66 PagesBooks† adjustments in the reconciliation require a journal entry. 7-16 SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES EXERCISE 7-1 (10–15 minutes) (a) Cash includes the following: 1. Commercial savings account— First National Bank of Yojimbo 1. Commercial checking account— First National Bank of Yojimbo 2. Money market fund—Volonte 5. Petty cash 11. Commercial Paper (cash equivalent) 12. Currency and coin on hand Cash reported on December 31, 2007, balance sheet (b) Other items classified as follows: 3. 4. Travel advances

The Song of Songs vs. Lady Antebellum’s Our Kind of Love Free Essays

The Song of Songs vs. Lady Antebellum’s â€Å"Our Kind of Love† The excerpts from The Bedford Anthology of World Literature entitled The Song of Songs can correlate to the contemporary love song â€Å"Our Kind of Love† sang by the notorious, award-winning country music group Lady Antebellum. Besides the fact that these two works were written under antithetical circumstances and during distinctly different time periods, they both share many of the same attributes. We will write a custom essay sample on The Song of Songs vs. Lady Antebellum’s Our Kind of Love or any similar topic only for you Order Now Both of these works closely examine the word â€Å"love†, a word that is commonly misused in the present day generation. Furthermore, they both portray the profound, romantic feeling that a woman and a man share when they are both mentally and physically attracted to each other. The Song of Songs, is often misunderstood. When many people first read this poem, they find it hard to believe that this sexual, explicit love poem is found in the Bible. Phrases like, â€Å"do not rouse her† (210. 9), â€Å"your lips drop sweetness like the honeycomb† (213. 11), â€Å"I have stripped off my dress† (214. 3), and â€Å"I am a wall and my breasts are like towers† (218. 0), are present throughout this poem. Many people read these phrases and think of them to be sexual connotations. These phrases are indeed erotic but what most people do not understand is that this poem is meant to show the love that God has created for a male to feel towards a female and a female to feel towards a male when they are in a monogamous relationship. This poem was also intended to be able to be used as lyric al hymn that could be sung. Many songs in today’s culture portray this feeling of love as well. Our Kind of Love† is a country song sang by the country musical group Lady Antebellum. Although, at first many people may not agree, The Song of Songs, a poem that can be found in the Bible, and â€Å"Our Kind of Love†, a song that just recently was produced, share many of the same qualities. The Song of Songs has two main characters: the bride and the bridegroom whom are lovers. The companions are another group of characters in this poem. They are kind of like the narrators of the poem that chime in at certain times. Each of the three characters plays a contrary role in the love poem. In â€Å"Our Kind of Love†, the country group Lady Antebellum, sings about the love shared between a male and a female. In this song, a man and a woman take turns singing about their love for each other. Even though â€Å"Our Kind of Love† is a song, it can also be considered a poem as well. While reading The Song of Songs, one might doubt that it is a poem because many of the lines contained in this poem do not rhyme with each other however, a poem does not always have to rhyme. One might also disagree that a song such as â€Å"Our Kind of Love† can be a poem, but a song was at one time just a poem until it was actually made into a song. When first looking at both the poem and the song together, the stanza in which they are written looks almost identical besides the fact that the song is obviously shorter than the poem. This should be a clue to the readers right away that they are both poems. Another clue that both of these could be poems or songs, is the title of the poem The Song of Songs. The title says it all. â€Å"Our Kind of Love† and The Songs of Songs are both about two people madly in love. In both of these works, the characters both explain their love towards each other. However, the way they express their love for each other is extremely different. This is because of the difference in cultures and time periods. For example, in The Song of Songs the bridegroom describes his bride’s beauty by using a large amount of adjectives: How beautiful you are, my dearest, how beautiful! Your eyes behind your veil are like doves, your hair like a flock of goats streaming down Mount Gilead (212. 1). In â€Å"Our Kind of Love†, the way the male describes to the female her beauty sounds a little bit different than in The Song of Songs. He explains her beauty by using less description: â€Å"You wear your smile like a summer sky / Just shining down on me and you swear your heart is a free bird / On a lazy Sunday afternoon† (Lady Antebellum). Althou gh these two phrases sound completely different, they are both stating the same thing, that they both think their lover’s are beautiful. The first phrase is written more proper, and the second phrase is more straight-forward and to the point, and this is why a great number of people do not realize that even though the language of The Song of Songs and â€Å"Our Kind of Love† is different, a lot of the phrases in both of these works are stating the same or close to the same thing. Another example of the similarity of phrases is when the bride in The Song of Songs explains the type of love her and the bridegroom share and when both the female and the male in â€Å"Our Kind of Love† define the type of love they have together. The bride in The Song of Songs declares her love for the bridegroom: My beloved has gone down to his garden, to the beds where balsam grows, to delight in the garden and to pick the lilies. / I am my beloved’s, and my beloved is mine, he who delights in the lilies (215. 2-3). In comparison to this phrase, the male and female in â€Å"Our Kind of Love† explain their love by singing: â€Å"Just like driving on an open highway / Never knowing what we’re gonna find / Just like two kids, baby, always trying to live it up / Whoa, yeah, that’s out kind of love (Lady Antebellum). The Song of Songs was written during a much more earlier time period than â€Å"Our Kind of Love†. One can tell this by comparing the language that is used in both of these works. â€Å"Our Kind of Love† is a contemporary song that just came out in the year 2010. This song consists of everyday, modern language. It is very easy to understand the plot of this song just by listening to it or reading it through once. In contrast, The Song of Songs was written â€Å"between 350 and 250 B. C. E. † (208). This poem is much more difficult to understand than Lady Antebellum’s song because it uses more proper, precise language. The Songs of Songs may require a little extra attention in order to clearly understand the poem. This is what throws most people off and makes them think these two works are not alike. However, if one actually takes the time to look over The Song of Songs a couple of extra times, then he will see that they are stating the same objective, just using a different way to say it. When first looking at this essay, one might not agree with my idea that Lady Antebellum’s recent record-breaking hit, â€Å"Our Kind of Love† and the biblical love poem, The Song of Songs are alike. They are indeed written from different time periods and from different cultures however, by now one should agree that these two works are more similar than they are dissimilar. They both have two main characters, a male and a female. Both of these works can be cited as poems or sung aloud. Also, they are both profound love poems. Many say that The Song of Songs was created in order to show God’s creation between a man and a woman and the love they share with each other, and that is what both of these works are doing. Even though The Song of Songs is much longer in length than â€Å"Our Kind of Love†, they both have the same point. One should take the time to examine both of these popular love poems/songs, because it is very interesting to see how big of an impact a difference in culture plays in World Literature. It is very amusing to see how a love poem written somewhere between 350 and 250 B. C. E. can relate so much to a contemporary country song. Works Cited â€Å"The Song of Songs. † The Bedford Anthology of World Literature. Ed. Paul Davis, Gary Harrison, David M. Johnson, Patricia Clark Smith, and John F. Crawford. Book 1 ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2004. 208-19. Print. The Ancient World, Beginnings-100 C. E. Lady Antebellum. â€Å"Our Kind of Love. † Need you Now. Quad Studios, 2010 How to cite The Song of Songs vs. Lady Antebellum’s Our Kind of Love, Papers

Court System free essay sample

A court system is created to determine the innocent and the guilty when a conflict arises. In many cases it is convicting a criminal for a crime that has been committed. The system entitles everyone to a fair trial no matter what the case and in each trial it is the team that is prosecuting that most prove that if the accused is guilty. Not the accused having to prove their innocence. The victim in most cases looks to see that justice is served to the criminal. The accused looks to try and get another chance in life and to make the court believe that they can change. In the United States criminal justice system, there are two main court systems, the state and federal court system. Within these two systems, there are several levels of courts. The Federal Courts The federal court system has three levels: the District Court, the Circuit Court, and the Supreme Court. We will write a custom essay sample on Court System or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Federal District Courts: The lowest level of federal courts, where lawsuits are taken the first time and trials are held, is called the District Court level. District Courts hear every type of federal case, whether it is a civil or criminal case. Each district can have more judges, and it covers either the whole state or a part of it. There are two groups of district court judges, regular service and senior status. They have the same power and their jobs are secured for their entire lives (as stipulated under Article III Section I of the U. S. Constitution). The only difference is that senior judges, because they were on the bench for at least ten years they can take lighter caseloads and may choose what types of cases they hear. District Court judges are often assisted by Magistrate Judges. Magistrates are not judges that have their place secured. But, they are auxiliary officers (appointed under Article I of the Constitution) who handle certain kinds of tasks sent by District Judges. Magistrates can take pleas of not guilty in felony criminal charges; they also frequently handle discovery disputes, misdemeanor trials, settlement negotiations, and hearings to calculate damages. Their orders can be appealed to the District Judge who initially had the case. Besides the District Courts, there are a few trial level federal courts with limited subject-matter jurisdiction, among these are the Court of Claims and the Court of International Trade. Federal Appeals Courts: The next level of federal courts is the Circuit Courts of Appeal. These courts hear appeals of decisions from the District Court in their geographical region. Like District Court Judges, Circuit Judges have their jobs secured for their entire lives. Almost all District Court orders can be appealed to the Circuit Court although, with the exception of a few specific types of orders, like the ones granting or denying preliminary injunctions, the majority of orders cannot be appealed right away. Instead, parties have to wait for the case to be closed in the District Court, and afterwards raise all the appeals at a single time. Circuit Court Judges sit in random panels of three judges for each case, unlike District Court Judges, who sit alone for their cases. Sitting by designation is the process when, on occasion, the Chief Judge of a Circuit invites a District Court Judge or a judge from another circuit, to temporarily sit on a panel of 3 judges to hear one or more appeals. When sitting by designation, a District Court Judge may not review his own decisions that he made earlier. The decisions of the Circuit Court are connected to the district courts within that circuit. This develops the uniformity of law in each circuit, even though the circuits might disagree strongly on points of law. The Supreme Court: The highest level of federal courts is the United States Supreme Court. The Court hears appeals from the Circuits Courts, from the highest courts of each state, only if a federal issue is involved, or very rarely, from a District Court decision. The Court sometimes becomes a trial court for some categories of cases mentioned in the constitution, like lawsuits between states. Even though it is primarily an appeal court it is not obligated to hear any given case, the Justices vote if they should allow a case to be heard in the Supreme Court Traditionally, 4 votes in favor is enough to qualify the case for a hearing. The majority of cases are declined by the Court for an appeal. If the case is denied a hearing, is should not be taken as an indicator of the Courts views on the fact that the case is worth an appeal. As harsh as it may sound, it should be taken into consideration the fact that the Court decides only 100-150 cases each Term, out of the 6000 requests for hearings annually. The Supreme Court is the final authority of law in the United States. As a result, it is often used to resolve conflicts between the Circuits, for example, in interpreting federal statutes. Hearings are more likely to be granted when such issues are involved. Currently there are 9 Justices, even though the number has varied before the 20th century. Supreme Court Justices must be confirmed by majority vote in the Senate, just like District and Circuit Court judges, before taking office. The highest ranked Justice is the Chief Justice of the United States. The Chief Justice, who must be confirmed in that position even if he is already an Associate Justice when he is nominated, has special administrative and ceremonial functions. In addition, he always has the power to select who will write the decision for the side to which the Chief Justice votes in a case. When the Chief Justice votes as the majority, he can write the opinion of the Court, or can assign another Justice on the same side to do it. At retirement, a Justice can continue to work actively as a judge, but not at the Supreme Court. Often, Retired Justices are invited to sit on Circuit Court panels. The State Courts The general workplace of a State Court system is the trial court. This is the lowest level of State Court and is usually the place where a case or lawsuit originates. It can be a court of general jurisdiction, like a circuit or superior court, or it may be a court of special or limited jurisdiction, such as a probate, juvenile, traffic, or family court. Some states handle small cases in separate courts, while others handle cases like these in special divisions of the general trial courts. This is also true for probate and juvenile matters. Family Courts hear cases involving mostly custody and child support, neglect and abuse cases, and, sometimes, juvenile crime or truancy. Most of the family courts do not deal with divorces, which are generally handled by the courts of general jurisdiction. Traffic Courts deal with civil infractions and violations concerning motor vehicles, petitions for reinstatement of driving privileges, and other matters related to traffic. Some can handle minor criminal offenses related to motor vehicle violations. Most traffic courts do not handle automobile accident cases, as between the parties involved in an accident Small Claims Courts deal with all civil matters where the amount of money in the case does not exceed a certain amount which is the jurisdictional limit for that court. If someone seeks damages in an amount higher than the jurisdictional limit of the Small Claims Court, the person must either give up his right to the exceeding amount or re-file the case in a court with higher jurisdiction. The maximum jurisdictional limit of Small Claims Courts varies greatly from state to state but most of the times ranging from $3000 to $7500. Juvenile Courts deal with truancy and criminal offenses from minors. The maximum age of the minor ranges from state to state but generally it is either 16 or 18 years. Older juveniles who have committed serious crimes can be sent to a court of general jurisdiction to determine whether they should be tried as adults. States can have separate courts for criminal and civil matters. Most of the times, a trial court of general jurisdiction will deal with both, but often on separate dockets. Many Local or District Courts will have limited jurisdiction for criminal matters. In these circumstances, a person charged with a felony can be sued in the District Court and then sent to the next level court, which has proper jurisdiction, for criminal trial. This varies depending on each state. Every state has its own system to deal with appeals from the trial courts. Most states have a three level court system where there are intermediate courts of appeal that review jury verdicts or the opinions of trial court judges on a limited basis and under strict criteria. These courts of appeal can or cannot be distinguished by separate buildings or courthouses. Most of the times a court of appeal is in reality a panel of justices who only come to hear and decide cases at the level of appeal. After a states highest court the only remaining appeal is to the U. S. Supreme Court. However, the Supreme Court doesn’t take every matter from the state supreme courts, and only deals with matters in very limited circumstances for example, where a states highest court has ruled that a federal statute or treaty is invalid or unconstitutional, or where the highest courts of two or more states have ruled differently on federal matters. When a states highest court has decided a matter that involves both federal and state problems, the U. S. Supreme Court will refuse to deal with the matter if the nonfederal question is decisive in the case.

Japanese Communication free essay sample

In the Japanese culture, most every kind of communication and action depends on hierarchy. Hierarchy and seniority are extremely Important In Japan. When bowing to each other, the person of lower status bows more deeply, When In negotiations, the Japanese expect each side to send people of the same age and position, and they literally sit directly across the table from each other during discussions. In the order of speaking, the person with the highest status speaks last; no matter what is said or determined in a negotiation, the person with highest status speaks the last and most important words.In the same respect, a person of higher status speaks in a polite or casual speech, but the person of lower status is required to use super-polite or respectful speech. The Japanese do not use words that are too harsh or strong. They often use maybe and l think so, and they usually means the person feels very strongly about something, although Americans look at It as being weak or indecisive. We will write a custom essay sample on Japanese Communication or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The Japanese use the phrase had better Instead of should, and are shocked to ear that It sounds Like a warning or threat.They have been taught that It Is more polite. Some other examples of being based on hierarchy are Japanese seating arrangements, and the exchanging of business cards. For Instance, pertaining to seating, when sitting in a taxi, the person of higher status sits directly behind the driver, and the lowest ranking person sits next to the driver. When exchanging business cards, which is a very important formality of Japanese businessmen, the people with a higher level exchange their cards first, and then on down the line.At any level of status, when a business card is received, the title on the card is immediately checked to verify the status of the person giving the card. When speaking in a group, the Japanese regard one as having character and maturity when they speak for the good of the group; not weak, as Americans would consider themselves. Speaking out, regardless what the rest of the group thinks makes an American look ridiculous, with no credibility. And disagreeing too strongly makes one look Immature to the Japanese.A Japanese businessman will remain silent If he Is to sure of his ability to speak perfect English, so as not to embarrass himself. The Japanese hierarchy is understood across all cultures. The person with higher status or older age, automatically gains the respect of others. For instance, a supervisor in a factory tells his workers to do something a certain way, with no explanation as to why. If a worker were to question him, he would respond with something like Because I have thirty years of experience and I say you should do it this way! The Japanese expect no less than perfection in any product.To the Japanese eye, the slightest effect in a product indicates the overall quality of the company, its workers, and its management. The Japanese often express themselves with body language. For instance, eye contact Is considered rude and uncomfortable, and can be a sign of aggression In some cases; praying hands mean asking for a favor, forgiveness, or showing thanks for a meal; one arm extended, as In praying, means excuse me; crossing arms in front of yourself indicates disagreement, yet crossing arms in front giving a gift, it is required that you bow while holding the gift with both hands.The Japanese share common values and assumptions that are based on a very standardized educational system. Because of this, they need less spoken words to communicate. They often commu nicate with each other with very few words, a motion, or even silence. People of other countries use much more spoken words, and find it hard to understand how much the Japanese are trying to get across. Perhaps if all countries were as efficient as the Japanese in communication, the people of the world would get along better. Or at least in a more accurate manner.